The tsars or lenin between 1855 1956 essay

However, there are three aspects to success, success in the eyes of the ruler, the Russian people and judgement from outside Russia. Khrushchev was originally a peasant himself and therefore could relate to the main population.

However, the biggest decline was in livestock, for example the number of sheep and goats fell from Within 20 years, 24, mosques were destroyed.

Even dissidents, even the people who had been exiled to the gulag system cried on the news of his death. Therefore, the most successful ruler, most definitely, was Stalin.

However, when opposition increased, he turned to violence, murdering hundreds. He may have been deposed, but his success in demolishing Stalinism was apparent when his overthrow was not accompanied by an obituary.

This therefore suggests that Stalin was extremely popular and was loved The tsars or lenin between 1855 1956 essay the Russian people. Additionally, his rule ended when he died in bed, whereas all other leaders were either killed or removed from office. Therefore, when the cult of personality bias is removed, Khrushchev proved to be the most popular due to his popularity with the working classes.

Stalin did what he could for rapid industrialisation. However, this was nothing compared to Stalin. However, Lenin let conditions decline as this was his overall goal.

However, the success he experienced in the great patriotic war did much to restore some of his popularity. To keep him power, he introduced Russification, where Russia returned to traditional values. Later, however, he was murdered.

However, Khrushchev saw the happiness of the people as paramount. Even though these did not seem to help the people vastly at the time, they lay the foundations for further improvements in the future.

The other thing that needs to be looked at in regards to maintaining power is how the leaders were removed from power. Collectivisation was equally extensive; however, it ended up being rather counter productive as the land given to peasants by Lenin was effectively being taken away again by Stalin.

Popularity and support from the Russian people also contributed to whether a leader was successful or not. Therefore, in conclusion, economic progress was mostly made in the Stalin era.

More essays like this: However, as stated, although this should have resulted in vast opposition towards him, dissidents cried on the news of his death.

However, affection for Stalin was genuine due to propaganda and the longevity of his rule. Lenin, however, began to assert his authority without the use of violence with the one party state. Therefore, although it can be said that they did not look after the welfare of their people, they were still respected leaders.

Furthermore, most of the grain acquired by farmers could be sold for a much higher price on the black market, so very often grain was not available. Similarly, Nicholas II was abdicated, as he lost the support of the army.

In Russian political culture, this is good enough. Within his time as leader, he put 2. However, as a result of the rapid economic progress, Russia were able to fight and win the great patriotic war with an expanded military and better weapons due to the stronger economy.

As a born peasant himself, he placed a bigger priority on the production of consumer goods than heavy industry and even introduced the minimum wage in with the aim to improve the lives of Russians.

As a result of the strong opposition to collectivisation, some collectives burned all evidence that they were ever part of collectivisation to get out of the programme but to avoid being caught by the secret police, causing a decline in the amount being produced.

Was Stalin The Most Successful Ruler of Russia in the Period 1855-1956? Essay Sample

Compared to the Wall Street Crash which affected most westernised countries, Russia was progressing rapidly under Stalin.

What defines a leader is their people and, ultimately this means their attitude towards their people. However, under Lenin, the economy was second thought to many other policies, and was floundered due to the war and the revolution.

Therefore, Stalin is the most successful. Khrushchev, however, maintained his power by his policies.The Impact of Lenin on Russia and the Russian People Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (a.k.a Lenin) was born ininto a middle class family.

In the year when Lenin was 17 his elder brother Alexandra was executed for conspiring to assassinate the tsar. Was Stalin The Most Successful Ruler of Russia in the Period ? Essay Sample.

At first sight, it seems unlikely that Stalin was the most successful ruler of Russia in the whole of the years, when taking into account the large amount of the Tsars reforms, in comparison to the amount of people Stalin killed and repressed.

what extent was Lenin ‘heir to the Russian tradition of government’? Since the tsar, Lenin has taken the ‘throne’ and along with the Bolsheviks proceeded to turn Russia into a one-party state.

It can be argued that Russia has remained almost unchanged in terms of government policies and its traditions this is shown by Lenin's oppressive policies such. Essay about Assess the View That the Tsars Preferred Repression to Reform in the Period to Assess the view that the Tsars preferred repression to reform in the period to While the reforms between and strongly suggest the Tsars preferring a policy of reform rather than repression, the unexpected.

Lenin Followed Marxism, Stalin Did Not Essay - Marxism was defined by a man named Karl Marx and his associate Fredrich Engels. Basically, Marxism is defined as a conflict theory, as Marx said that society is separated by a conflict between the rich and the poor.

However, under Lenin, the economy was second thought to many other policies, and was floundered due to the war and the revolution. Furthermore, he was presided over a catastrophe, war communism.

Therefore, in conclusion, economic progress was mostly made in the Stalin era.

The tsars or lenin between 1855 1956 essay
Rated 3/5 based on 51 review