But in translating these philosophies into policy, neither party was very creative or ambitious. Between andfarmers placed million new acres under cultivation. The Secretary of War accepted bribes from merchants interested in lucrative trading franchises on Native American lands.
As politicians from both the White House to the courthouse were deeply entangled in corruption and scandal during the Gilded Age, the actual economic and social issues afflicting urbanizing America festered beneath the surface without being seriously addressed.
Several factors converged to make the Gilded Age—politically, the years between Presidents Grant and McKinley—so unimaginative and unambitious. Members of a small network gained power and used the public treasury to stay in power — and grow fabulously rich in the process. These "fusionists" now urged their fellow-Populists to join the Democrats in nominating Bryan for the presidency.
And consequently, nothing—perhaps worse than nothing—had been achieved. The Naval Department awarded contracts on the basis of favoritism rather than competitive bidding. The decision to embrace Bryan may have been the judicious course, but the Populist Party would never be the same.
And while the Republican Party dominated the presidency during these years, the Democrats consistently controlled the House of Representatives. Andrew Johnson was so hated he was impeached and would have been removed from office were it not for a single Senate vote.
They retained old Hamiltonian and Whig beliefs in the value of federal action in promoting economic development.
A Republican-biased electoral commission awarded all 20 electoral votes to the Republican Hayes, and he won by just one electoral vote. His secretary of war sold Indian land to investors and pocketed public money.
Although his political history was largely composed of appointments of friends, the tragedy that befell his predecessor led him to believe that the system had gone bad. Garfield Vice-President Chester Arthur became the next leader. After almost a century of debate, policymakers agreed that the federal government could generate revenues through a tariff, that had a certain narrow authority over interstate internal improvements such as railroads, and that the federal government was responsible for monitoring American currency.
They had, at least for a moment, broken the stranglehold of the two traditional parties and produced a viable third alternative for American voters.
In blaming a conspiracy of money men rather than the vicissitudes of global markets, farmers were able to build a coherent movement rather than just a political coalition, a movement for justice rather than just another political party.
He had not held a single elected office prior to the Presidency and was totally naive to the workings of Washington. Grant was a war hero but was unprepared for public office. Precisely twenty electoral votes were in dispute because the states submitted double returns — one proclaiming Hayes the victor, the other Tilden.
And, for better or for worse, they had forced the other parties to take notice. The smaller peoples, including farmers, laborers, and small businessmen, were left out of the political equation except at the local machine level. In addition to these philosophical inhibitions to government ambition, there were what might be labeled psychological inhibitions as well.
Many among the rank and file had earlier encouraged joining forces with the Democrats. In modern economic terms, the farmers wanted the government to pursue an inflationary monetary policy.
In the decades that followed, both parties would recognize the need not just to reach out to these disaffected voters, but to re-imagine the role of government in this new industrial era. The Populist Party also proposed an innovative government agency labeled the regional subtreasury.
And indeed, there were plenty of both to go around, at all levels of public life. The Populists were left in quandary. Most Americans embraced the laissez faire economic theories that served industrial leaders so well. Hayes himself had tremendous integrity, but his Presidency was weakened by the means of his election.
Since the Civil War, Americans had debated how much and what kind of money should be allowed to circulate. Though laws were passed in an attempt to mollify government interventions, most notably the Interstate Commerce Act of Ethese were often too vaguely worded to actually be effective.
Gold was coined and placed into circulation, and gold-backed bank notes circulated as a form of currency. Charles Guiteau, the killer, was so upset with Garfield for overlooking him for a political job that he shot the President in cold blood on the platform of the Baltimore and Potomac train station.
One President impeached, one President drowning in corruption, one President elected by possible fraud, one President assassinated, and one disgraced by his own party for doing what he thought was right.
The Presidency was at an all-time low in power and influence, and the Congress was rife with corruption. There were indeed general philosophical differences between the two major parties.Join now to read essay Gilded Age and scandal during the Gilded Age, the actual economic and social issues afflicting urbanizing America festered beneath the surface without being seriously addressed.
During this time, general American attention had shifted away from national politics and more towards economic change concerning the 3/5(2).
The Gilded Age will be remembered for the accomplishments of thousands of American thinkers, inventors, entrepreneurs, writers, and promoters of social justice.
Few politicians had an impact on the tremendous change transforming America. FRQ help! () Printer Friendly. "The politics of the Gilded Age failed to deal with the critical social and economic issues of the times." --> Assess the validity of this statement using time period or.
2. Progressives believed that greater democracy was the key to solving societies problems. the politics of the gilded age failed to deal with the critical social and economic issues assess the validity of this statement.
Use both the documents and your knowledge of the us from to Political Corruption. The political history of the Gilded Age is usually reduced to a tale of corruption and scandal.
And indeed, there were plenty of. The politics of the Gilded Age did fail to deal with the critical social and economic issues of the times. a. Government’s policy of “laissez faire” let wealthy business owners do whatever they wanted%(7).Download